That’s becoming another problem, availability. Try finding 4. Trying finding 1 right now. Locally they’ve been sold out in stores for 2 months. I know several who have placed orders online and after afew days the orders have been canceled.Buy 4 for $400 and pick the best of the bunch and have spares. (can you return the not so good motors?)
Or buy 1 for $550?
we have that happen here too but they don't always win. Some people think that because it's cheap that we must be easy meat.I would like to see tracks with pure stock Predator classes make it so if you're running that class you cannot run other classes that night. Try to keep it low level. Around here we see guys who have the best of everything running clones, SBO or whatever and dragging out a Predator class kart so they can win that too.
thing is the LO206 isn't in stock either. or locally available.That’s becoming another problem, availability. Try finding 4. Trying finding 1 right now. Locally they’ve been sold out in stores for 2 months. I know several who have placed orders online and after afew days the orders have been canceled.
I think Carlson has been getting so LO206’s. I don’t know if he has them anymore but I know he got a few pallets.thing is the LO206 isn't in stock either. or locally available.
I think Carlson has been getting so LO206’s. I don’t know if he has them anymore but I know he got a few pallets.
I've seen this play out so many times over the years that it's not funny.But that would take all the fun out of cheating . I have no doubt that the tech problems most tracks currently have is that they don't want to tech that hard to keep kart counts up. Same issue with the black flag. tick off to many people and they will find somewhere else to race. The problem with this logic is that you run off all of your good racers, and all you are left with are guys that want to tear stuff up and cheat.
In my opinion, it is better to not have a rule, than to have a rule, and not enforce it. Got a fuel rule? Test fuel. Got a cam rule? Pull some engines apart. Got a no-prep rule? Send samples to the lab. Don't have rules that you don't enforce, because then you make it hard to enforce the ones you do.
Anecdotal, but our local track that had an average of 150 karts per night last season just ran their biggest race of the year with added payouts and didn't draw 100. The same race last year had over 175 karts.I've seen this play out so many times over the years that it's not funny.
Promoter wants to be nice and send everyone home happy (no late nights in the tech barn.)
Racers (and builders) take advantage of this and push engines to the point of being stock appearings, only to run off the racers who want to run legal stuff (and at other tracks.) Pretty soon half the field is running cheated up engines (no matter what it is, flatheads to predators) and those that are legal start running elsewhere or sell out. Soon after the track becomes known as one with no tech, and soon after it goes out.
Then these cheated up engines start showing up at other tracks, and the whole area is muddied up. There are turn-key karts and whole operations sold with illegal engines (unbeknownst to the new owner) that end up back at the same track or another several states away.
Nothing new here.
What do you think the primary reason is that somebody would claim another engine in a stock class? The only times I've seen it done is when the "stock" engine was suspected to not be stock. Therefore you're basically buying a cheated up engine that has little to no value to the honest racer.What is it about the claimer rule that i'm not understanding?
Especially for the stock engine classes.
Why does this not work everywhere and every track do it?
Sounds like it would benefit every honest racer, if all honest racers brought claimer money instead of 10 backup engines, and buy up these cheaters and either switch them back or sell them for what they are.What do you think the primary reason is that somebody would claim another engine in a stock class? The only times I've seen it done is when the "stock" engine was suspected to not be stock. Therefore you're basically buying a cheated up engine that has little to no value to the honest racer.
Most claim rules have a limit on how many times you can claim somebody through the season. Most are twice. This means that you run out of opportunities quickly, and as such, nobody ever claims anything because of "what about next week".If it's just a "better engine" OTB then whoever was claimed one week, can just re-claim it the next. Until people start cheating other ways lol then claim those parts too.
I think we agree what we'd like to see on the track (everyone show up legal and race). I was responding to the question "Why does this not work everywhere and every track do it?". My thought is with your methodology the burden is being placed on the racer to keep their competitors legal. Some folks might not mind but others will. In the 2 instances that I have seen a stock class predator claimed it was b/c it was suspected to be illegal. 1 of the instances the claimer wanted to never have to compete against that suspected cheated up engine again so it was bought. Because it was thought to be illegal it was set on a shelf and never ran. In the other case, it was more of a "if you can't beat them join them" situation. There was no tech only a claim rule. So that racer figured he might as well have an advantaged every once in a while too. If it's that obvious I would hope the track would claim it to remove it from circulation.Sounds like it would benefit every honest racer, if all honest racers brought claimer money instead of 10 backup engines, and buy up these cheaters and either switch them back or sell them for what they are.
The rule itself deters cheaters throwing boo koo bucks into stock engines
Let 1 get bought up one time, if the driver doesn't show back up, you didnt want to race that fool anyway.
I respect your opinion, and appreciate your input though.