Some thoughts on the why of high and low cross

paulkish

old fart
Just getting started with this and putting thoughts to paper is taking longer then I thought it would.
So here's just the start of it.
My thought process on it is or was to lead next into how A. and B. will or can effect how you will need to use your RF tire.
... Here's the start just to see what might be said about it.

______________________________________


Up front this is only IMHO and ain't necessairly right anyway. ... :)
Butt maybe it might be right on looking for others to knock it askew a little to learn sumtin? ... :)


IMHO getting around a track well is about turning, maintaining momentum, how you use your tires(available grip) and how you apply your hp(available hp).
That's all there is and there ain't no more.



I. It's all about turning.
A. Higher Cross will require more weight transfer via operating your chassis.
1. More mechanical action of your chassis will be needed.
a. For the same chassis action results to occur at the same physical place on the track, chassis mechanical action must start sooner.
B. Lower cross will require less weight transfer via operating your chassis.
1. Less mechanical action from your chassis will be needed.
a. Chassis mechanical action from your chassis can start later then with higher cross.
C. ???


II. On to RF tire presentation because of:
A. ??? load, speed, grip, banking and again ????????
 
Last edited:
Just looked at the diagram I tried to do.

Bob or anyone?
Is there a way to do diagrams on here?
I led into each "A." with spaces.
Do I have to use tab's or something else instead?


nope tried tabbing instead of spacing to indent but couldn't make it work.

I guess my question is how do you indent when writing a post that will remain indented after posting?
 
Back
Top