Nice picture, Al needs to add his "compression is the holy grail" caption to that
I think you will find that the rest of the world of automotive engineering will disagree with you.Lol... How much is too much? I honestly think compression can be too high in one of these. Compression can work against these engines when operating in broad rpm ranges. The motor has to work too hard to overcome the compression at lower rpm. But I've also read that alcohol's potential isn't realized until CR are 14:1 or higher.
Hey what does he know, hes just a WELDER jk Brad. looks good. going to be doing one soon, all I weld these days is Aluminum. The OTC machines "mig" we have at work are finiky as hell. weld speed/ feed changes when room temp changes . they have people grinding out the seam welds on one part.. 0 porosity allowed.. good thing about these heads is they will fit in a lunchbox.. Government work approved.Guys, this statement I made is not true. In the bonehead move of the year I somehow grabbed the stock cam and started putting the motor together. When searching around my table where I took the engine apart looking for the tin bolts (yes, that's how far along I was) I noticed a cam with some big lobes on it. SMH I about passed out. So after trying it in the block I now have to cut lifter pockets to accommodate the .350 lift cam. I'm giving up on it for a few days and going to mourn the loss of a fair amount of work. I'll let you guys know what the spring looks like at .350 lift once I get that far. Sorry for the false info, hopefully nobody is paying attention to me anyway.
I think you will find that the rest of the world of automotive engineering will disagree with you.
From my experience, the only limiting factor on compression is the octane of the fuel.
"Alcohol's potential"? I'm wondering, you might want to change that to, "alcohols full potential".
From the desk of Al Nunley
Comments compliments criticisms and questions always welcome.
If the data does not support the theory, get a new theory. (Al Nunley)
very interesting. And why would multiple cylinders like more compression than single cylinders?I agree on the too much compression on a single cylinder. ..now with more cylinders helping ...give me compression. ..
very interesting. And why would multiple cylinders like more compression than single cylinders?
From the desk of Al Nunley
Comments compliments criticisms and questions always welcome.
If the data does not support the theory, get a new theory. (Al Nunley)
then how do you explain the Rotax twin 250? Both cylinders fire at the same time. You know at one time F1 V8 engines had pairs of cylinders firing at the same time. The Harley Davidson twins don't fire 180° apart.and your thoughts would be right...the offsets of the crank for the individual cylinders would lend to pushing each other up during the compression phase....
then how do you explain the Rotax twin 250? Both cylinders fire at the same time. You know at one time F1 V8 engines had pairs of cylinders firing at the same time. The Harley Davidson twins don't fire 180° apart.
From the desk of Al Nunley
Comments compliments criticisms and questions always welcome.
If the data does not support the theory, get a new theory. (Al Nunley)
what octane fuel did you run with that 14–1 compression ratio? Did you try testing with a colder spark plug? Did you try a bigger jet? An EGT gauge might have told you something.I haven't been able to make a noticeable power increase over 14 to 1 compression, but I may be doing something wrong.
180* degrees helps with smoothness of engine. Balance factors.then how do you explain the Rotax twin 250? Both cylinders fire at the same time. You know at one time F1 V8 engines had pairs of cylinders firing at the same time. The Harley Davidson twins don't fire 180° apart.
From the desk of Al Nunley
Comments compliments criticisms and questions always welcome.
If the data does not support the theory, get a new theory. (Al Nunley)
what octane fuel did you run with that 14–1 compression ratio? Did you try testing with a colder spark plug? Did you try a bigger jet? An EGT gauge might have told you something.
From the desk of Al Nunley
Comments compliments criticisms and questions always welcome.
If the data does not support the theory, get a new theory. (Al Nunley)