kartkevin39
Member
Just got a new GX390 and was wondering how much I might be looking at to make it an OPEN engine and who could help me do so?
Very good advice from both of these guys.
I can build a very reliable 32-33 CHP GX390 engine that turns 7200 rpm all day long. No, it will not hang with a MX450 engine on a big track, but it sure beats twisting a stroked animal to the moon for about the same cost ($2800.)
If you're needing cheap and reliable -- it's hard to beat a MXer that's designed and built to run 100,000 miles on pump gas.
------------------------------------------
Thanks and God bless,
Brian Carlson
Carlson Racing Engines
Vector Cutz
www.CarlsonMotorsports.com
28 years of service to the karting industry
Linden, IN
765-339-4407
bcarlson@CarlsonMotorsports.com
=================================================================That's a very open ended question.
First, you'd have to take into consideration the parts used in your build.
Stroke crank, compression piston, valve sizes, carb size, cam lift & duration, etc etc.
Running gas is not a huge deficit to alcohol (although I prefer alcohol as a race engine fuel) when it comes to making power.
That will not be your limiting factor. Detonation at higher compression ratios, less heat control, etc is more of an issue with highly modified race engines on gasoline.
Then consider that everyone's dynos will read differently....some builders offer extremely inflated numbers as part of their sales pitch or simply to dismiss the fixation racers have on "numbers."
Throwing a 50 CHP number out there may sound real impressive, but even if it's accurate...If it's in a build that's not reliable or at a usable rpm, then what's the point? My point is, it's pretty easy to build a reliable 30 CHP that's somewhat affordable. It's quite another thing to build 50 CHP. (ie it's not easy OR cheap!)
-----
Thanks and God bless,
Brian Carlson
Carlson Racing Engines
Vector Cutz
www.CarlsonMotorsports.com
Carlson Motorsports on Facebook
29 years of service to the karting industry
Linden, IN
765-339-4407
bcarlson@CarlsonMotorsports.com
=========================================================Ok 10% more then stock. With excellent durability.
=================================================================
Not really really open ended. I said, "So what kind of HP can a GX390 make at Max 5500rpm running 93 Octane with the best Parts for Endurance?"
So you have a Base GX390 a Set CC to use (88mm x 64mm) 389cc to work with. NO Big Bore or Stroker, just 389cc!
I didn't say for Racing, I said for Endurance!
I said using 93 Octane Gas, so that set's the limit on what Max CR you can use, guessing 11.5cr, probably Max CR I would want to run anyway.
You have a Set Max 5500rpm to use to pick the CAM.
So You Pick the CAM based on this Max Rpm, Valve Sizes, Carb Size, and other HD Internal/External Parts needed for Endurance!
Think of it being used at Continious 4800-5000rpm on a Mini Air Boat or Snow Glider, Hence Endurance is the key Factor. Yes, I know there are Bigger, maybe even better Engines out there, I want to keep it as light as Possible and the GX390 being the Smallest I want to use.
So Carb, CAM, Valve Sizes, CR, and HD Parts needed for Endurance, Roller Rockers, Push Rods, FlyWheel, Rod, Bolts/Studs.
I did forget to mention I want Electric Start. Will be using one of them light Weight Lithium Batterys. A 240CCA 2.4lb one turns my Yamaha Vmax 600(95hp) Snowmobile Engine better than the Old Style Lead Acid Battery ever did.
How long do you wish it to endure at increased HP?
I consider this an "open ended" question as to how best to build your engine.
You mentioned nothing in your post about the application, intended use, or how long you wish it to last.
Performance is almost always a trade-off with durability.
I'm sorry I wasn't able to help you.
=========================================================That's all well and good.
I'm no airplane pilot but cavitation seems like it would be an issue at higher rpm .
On top of that you want endurance building for
Max power at 5000 rpm is not in that equation.
Well as you well know volumetric efficiency is where it's at.
Yes I would definitely ride that!