So the military only uses safety wire on Heli rotors so they don't lose the $249 bolts, sold to them by a congressmans company.
No, the military uses safety wire as a set of suspenders to go with the belt of tightening procedures that yield high initial preloads and minimize (to the extent that it is possible to do so) fastener to fastener preload variation. High initial preload (comensurate with the joint design and fastener material choices) and minimization of fastener to fastener preload variation around a bolt circle always have been and always will be the cornerstone of mechanical joint integrity. Safety wire prevents total loss of the nut (or bolt when used on a bolt in a blind hole) - nothing more, but nothing less, and usually preventing total loss will get you home, or result in a situation which yields an obvious visual indication of impending failure (like a minor leak in a piping system joint) so that repairs can be initiated. The earliest attempts to prevent in-service loosening of a fastener most likely involved lock wires, keys and cotter pins, and these methods still find a lot of use, but these methods are not very effective at preventing large loss of preload. 2 degrees of rotation of the nut can reduce preload by over 1/4 of its total value, 6 degrees can reduce it by a bit over 40%, and both these rotations are possible (and have been recorded) in nuts and bolts that were properly safety wired. Lock wire systems aren't intended to provide tight control of nut (or bolt head) motion over the long haul, thay are, to re-emphasize, there to prevent total loss of the nut or bolt. Even if they save the nut or bolt, the loss of preload often leads to fatigue or other types of failure. It must be remembered that in bolted joints subject to cyclic loads, all that is necessary to cause low cycle fatigue failure is for the cyclic load to exceed the preload (NOT exceed the yield strength, but only exceed the preload) of the fastener, and this is a condition that often exists when fasteners lose preload in service. Are you familiar with the maintenance schedule for the fasteners on heli rotor heads? They get enough scheduled regular attention that safety wire will usually get you home even if a problem develops, or at least the maintenance schedules used on Navy and Marine Corps helicoptor rotor heads do; I can't speak for the Army or the Air Force helicoptors, but I seriously doubt that the planned maintenance schedule for them is much different.
As for $249 bolts, you can get there without even using a congressmans's company in some services if you have to order in small lots (like 6 or a dozen) to cover unanticipated repair needs. Hull integrity joints (joints that keep water out of the people tank) on a submarine are required to have a Material Identification and Control package that covers them from darn near when the ore comes out of the ground in the Mesabi range or wherever until the finished fastener is installed on the submarine, and each fastener is marked in a manner that makes it traceable back to the specific MIC Level I package that covers it's manufacture. That means a routine largish alloy steel nut that would cost $3.00 at a local industrial supply house costs a lot more to the Navy. But the price of that documentation package doesn't change much whether the supply system (or a Contractor) has to buy a dozen in a hurry or 3000 to cover anticipated needs over the next 18 months, so if you buy 3000, the per nut cost goes down to pennies apiece. Then, of course, there are the special applications that not only use MIC Level I fasteners but are made from various types of semi-unobtainium for which the bar stock is made by small producers in relatively small lots only on special order. Unfortunately, due to the materials required to meet space and weight constraints for use in certain critical services and traceability requirements like MIC Level I, $249 bolts or nuts are more common than you would imagine, even when not bought from a Congressman's company, though fortunately they aren't the norm, in either submarines or helicopters, though we probably have more on subs, just because we have a few more critical mechanical joints.