I have to agree that Buller knows what he’s doing, but I have a different idea on what his reasoning was for choosing that primary drive ratio.
Knowing how many people would call him for that ratio, and how much time that would take, why not just give out a, “one ratio fits all” number. I’m sure that number works well and it eliminates a lot of discussion time on where to set the clutch and what secondary ratio to run. He knows that any primary ratio, that spins the clutch in a certain range, is okay. The one he gives out is one of those ratios. There’s nothing magic about that ratio. Thing is, he knows a lot of people are going to be calling him on the ratio to use, and having a one-size-fits-all, (not that that’s bad) makes it a lot simpler.
The thing that everybody should consider is that the clutch should be holding the engine at peak torque while slipping on the starts, or coming out of a tight turn.
Another thing to consider is the ratio difference between different gears on this secondary with different primary ratios.
For instance;
Primary secondary difference
21/57…….. 15/60…15/61…. .18
20/50…….. 15/60… 15/61…. .17
in these 2 examples you can see there’s not much difference. The difference does go up the greater the difference in the primary ratio.
Comments compliments criticisms and questions always welcome.
If the data does not support the theory, get a new theory. (Al Nunley)