He is not running a Jawa any longer, just says an open kart engine this time.
With a big horse power kart a lot of nose weight isn't required due to the transfer of so much weight. Just getting it up to 44 is a struggle for some. So as long as the kart is good turning in and not floating the front like several big fours I have run against. Mine tends to float the front too occasionally, 44 nose isn't terrible. Too much nose and you're fighting to get it to transfer back coming off fast enough to ever hook a big engine up off the corner. Plus over loading the front going in.
So 44 if the kart isn't pushing coming off or going in I'd try it and maybe change it later. If the kart won't turn at the apex is a whole different ball game.
Al, widening the rear track on a LTO chassis is usually done at the lr, and most chassis have a window where they operate best. 38-1/2 to 39-1/2 is a huge difference. 1/8 to 1/4 adjustments are usually made and that isn't on a whim. Usually 39 will get you close, and adjust up or down to fine tune in 1/8 to 1/4 increments. As it changes how and when weight is transferred.
PS, I agree with Racing Promotor, add stagger before adjusting track width unless you know you're not transferring weight properly and can feel it not coming off the LR enough. Some people know what it should feel like, some don't.
With the numbers the Op listed on the revised setup should get the kart close without knowing much else. It's a better starting spot I feel than the original numbers by far. Not exactly sure about the dirt in that location but, I'm in the south and we run entirely different dirt! So those numbers could leave the kart loose and fighting for traction period if he is on worm dirt. Now, camber and castor play a large roll in how the kart performs at the entrance and out of the apex. If you're struggling with the numbers you listed, start looking at castor and camber settings.