Sprint Enduro Chassis Design

Flash765

Member
I'm getting ready to build a sprint Enduro chassis to run an Animal on and I'm curious about chassis dimensions vs a normal sprint chassis.

Kingpin distance, wheel base, frame rail distance, etc.
 
Thanks for the reply. I have all the rule books.

I was more so hoping for open discussion with fellow racers that are involved in that part of the sport.

Frame dimensions aren't that proprietary because if you can buy it, you can measure it.

Tubing on the other hand... Well, that's a whole different rabbit hole.
 
Roger . Spit ballin here . i would think c-type spindles , to keep a narrow c/c . frame rails as close too my personel body width as possible .
Wheel base , max allowed with a stiff front hoop .
 
We Animals run with the maximum wheelbase of 43.0” and rarely the minimum track width of 28". A track width of 31" seems best for my dense cranium and 6'2" frame. Ye Olde Bandit chassis of mine has 3/4" stepped spindles. Fabricated long as possible and radius rod ends that support spindles, if I recall 22" on a horizontal line center of kingpin. This was changed from original, It did make me a bit faster. I believe the tubing is 1 1/8" OD nothing magical ASFIK. I tried a 40mm rear axle and honestly could not tell the difference to 1 1/4". The bearing hanger to inside of tire is about an inch so that is a significantly shorter lever arm then most spirit chassis. Open to sharing more details.
 
I've been in several discussions with Al posted on this site.
Most are geared toward lto dirt chassis, but, the geometry and wheel loadings are the same, if you can make the leap, and understand that any changes are manifested at the contact patch.

Search kingpin inclination.

Being able to stack causes and effects doesn't hurt any either.

Changing the width of the kingpin centerline changes the weight transfer effects on a lefty/righty chassis.
The distance between contact patches is also relevant.

What problem are you looking to overcome?
 
Last edited:
There's no problem, yet...

We built our own standard sprint chassis for this season and was fairly successful with it and are looking to adapt that chassis to road racing. Won out of the gate, got poles, set fast laps, lots of podiums and decent performance at Grands with less than stellar results, because, well, it's Grands...

Just looking for ideas on where to start the project at this point.

I know we will need overall less grip and less aggressive mechanical jacking. It's a typical Euro design but with a straight rear cross rail. 25mm front spindles and 50mm rear axle.

Current thoughts were to narrow the frame a couple of inches and bring the C's narrower by the same or more. Switch to 17's and a 40 and go max wheelbase.

Spindle C's currently at at a 22° natural caster with the kingpins centered.

1.25" tubing all around of varying wall thicknesses.
 
So less overall grip, more roll speed, less jacking.

22 degrees caster seems excessive.

Any kingpin inclination?

More kpi, less lift from outside front tire contact patch at turn in.

Chassis stiffness in correct direction can affect weight transfer.

Knowing what you want to accomplish can help.
 
So less overall grip, more roll speed, less jacking.

22 degrees caster seems excessive.

Any kingpin inclination?

More kpi, less lift from outside front tire contact patch at turn in.

Chassis stiffness in correct direction can affect weight transfer.

Knowing what you want to accomplish can help.
The spindles we were using were 10°

When we're talking KPI are we talking spindle degree that everyone refers to as KPI, or the actual KPI that's affected by the static position of the C?

The caster was perfect for us on a fairly tight track, we ran a little caster out from neutral.
 
Most refer to kpi and spindle build angle as interchangeable. If kpi and spindle build angle do not match, this also affects geometry as related to the tire contact patch.

Some of the discussion relates to caster and kpi being separated by varying degrees affecting mechanical weight transfer, of course, related to camber.

Both caster and kpi affect the camber change curve.

Track width, tire size, air pressure, front and rear camber all affect roll speed in a straight line
 
B-man
The 22" centerline c/c , is that more ore less then original ?
Less but I am not positive on the actual dimensions. The goal was more KPI with a relatively low caster angle. The thinking and affect was stability at straight line speed. More than we had in the original of weight transfer. I don't know how to explain in words but basically I can lane change with little effort and great stability. Turn in is great and I can power thru the turn. When the toe and scaling is right she needs wheel chocks on a pool table, slightest breeze gets to rolling.
 
Last edited:
Full body like this:

279612193_2243279699169338_2169326646620527579_n.jpg


Image taken from Linsell Speed Shop website.
 
Agree. The Emmick I used for sprint enduro had a wider body compared to more modern ones and it was hard to find same speed. Aerodinamically It was like trying to make a big hole in the straights, needing higher ratios than most.
 
I wish someone made a thermoformed lexan piece that would bolt on in place of the tall nose fairing piece that sticks up. Would greatly help visibility... Interested to see your build My Jaguar is a little wider that it could be...
 
Back
Top