CarlsonMotorsports
Site Supporter
...I would still like to see that 30* dimension spelled out. I've seen a lot of "questionable" seats, but without a definite measurement or exaggerated/excessive width I don't feel comfortable tossing them. What width is "excessive?"
I don't see anyone cutting a true second relief angle on the seat, but cleaning up that chamfer - sure. If they were cutting .050" wide, you bet that's an easy call (compared to known stock.) That's not what I'm talking about.
As a tech man, explaining to the competitor that a part "looks" illegal and then calling them on it for the appearance alone is a tough call when we're talking .001"s. And don't think that every little bit doesn't help. Again, a reason to spell out this dimension.
Maybe there's hope for next year.
I don't see anyone cutting a true second relief angle on the seat, but cleaning up that chamfer - sure. If they were cutting .050" wide, you bet that's an easy call (compared to known stock.) That's not what I'm talking about.
As a tech man, explaining to the competitor that a part "looks" illegal and then calling them on it for the appearance alone is a tough call when we're talking .001"s. And don't think that every little bit doesn't help. Again, a reason to spell out this dimension.
Maybe there's hope for next year.