wilkerson99
New member
Did I miss a post about camber settings and rear wheel spacing off frame? Kinda curious as to what helps. Never know where you maybe racing..
Did I miss a post about camber settings and rear wheel spacing off frame? Kinda curious as to what helps. Never know where you maybe racing..
As soon as I seen the air pressure's that was a dead giveawayHe said he was in the Pacific NW. That narrows it down to somewhere up in the FAR NW portion of the US of A. Why suggest anything other than what he specifically ask about? He's winning. He's just not winning by as much as he was before the tire change. He is just looking to tweak things. He looking to get those couple of tenths back on his lead that he was most comfortable with. There's no need to rebuild the kart under him.
As soon as I seen the air pressure's that was a dead giveaway
He said he was in the Pacific NW. That narrows it down to somewhere up in the FAR NW portion of the US of A. Why suggest anything other than what he specifically ask about? He's winning. He's just not winning by as much as he was before the tire change. He is just looking to tweak things. He looking to get those couple of tenths back on his lead that he was most comfortable with. There's no need to rebuild the kart under him.
The Overall effect of reducing stagger will decrease load on the RR and increase or share load to the LR . Both from decreased loading through an increase of cross as well as decreased loading induced from forward thrust of the "Drive Tires" and the effect of rollout differential on them. You see as the rear tires are trying to drive the kart up out of the corner , the more closely the rollout of each tire is ( closer to zero stagger) the more equally the load created from forward thrust will be applied to the rear tires. For example: in a case of more rear stagger, the smaller the LR is in comparison to the RR , we know that it travels a shorter distance for a given number of revolutions than the RR. This creates some what of a breaking or dragging effect at the LR. The RR has to overcome this to propel the kart in a straight line (late exit) now that the RR is getting less help from the LR ( or in some cases direct opposition ) the Load or (resistance to movement ) is concentrated at the RR.
Another effect of more rear stagger that has to be considered is a slight change in chassis heights in both front to back and side to side rake, as well as a small change in the avg. rear roll center or Center of gravity height. In this scenario the lower RR height takes rake out from front to back and left to right at the rear. Lower rear can increase transfer in a front to back motion, but the lower cg or rear roll center height cancels this effect out for the most part reducing transfer from left to right.
So in a nutshell less rear stagger equals less RR load
Read the mans last post. Thats why....
But his first post he asked for thoughts, thinking he wasnt loading the RR.
If he asked in his first what he said in his last, i wouldnt have said what i did.
At our track, we have a very difficult time properly loading the right rear on exit. I am thinking I need to back off the rear stagger (1" - 3/4" to somewhere down around 1/2" or less.)
Thoughts?
12.25 seat height is un-herd of for a Sr set-up and be competitive, unless it's just a backyard type race and everyone else is set-up close the same for comfort not speed, at 12.25 " seat height I would be amazed that your problem is NOT using your RR enough.